• jordanlund@lemmy.world
            shield
            M
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I won’t reveal who reports who, but I will say it was someone else.

            The civility rule is NOT ambiguous:

            “Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members.”

            • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              All good but this moderation approach is censoring non-problematic content because some people have poor reading comprehension and/or don’t understand sarcasm.

              I would expect them to get better instead of content getting diluted.

              @eldavi@lemmy.ml did confirm that he did not report me, so this is literally some third party injecting themselves into a discussion. Either way, rules can be used by faith actors to stifle speech, that’s how it works on reddit. I would posit context should be counted when issuing removals.

              • jordanlund@lemmy.world
                shield
                M
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                It literally doesn’t matter who reported it, you broke the civility rule. Had I come across the comment organically I still would have removed it.

                Don’t attack other users. Full stop.