• jordanlund@lemmy.world
      shield
      M
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I won’t reveal who reports who, but I will say it was someone else.

      The civility rule is NOT ambiguous:

      “Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members.”

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        All good but this moderation approach is censoring non-problematic content because some people have poor reading comprehension and/or don’t understand sarcasm.

        I would expect them to get better instead of content getting diluted.

        @eldavi@lemmy.ml did confirm that he did not report me, so this is literally some third party injecting themselves into a discussion. Either way, rules can be used by faith actors to stifle speech, that’s how it works on reddit. I would posit context should be counted when issuing removals.

        • jordanlund@lemmy.world
          shield
          M
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It literally doesn’t matter who reported it, you broke the civility rule. Had I come across the comment organically I still would have removed it.

          Don’t attack other users. Full stop.