Genocide. New holocaust.
if we’re lucky, there’s be a paragraph about it between to the paragraph about the trail of tears and the other paragraph about martin luther king jr in american history books.
But have you thought about rich Americans’ right to defend themselves, shitlord?
Removed, civility.
Which part was not civil?
Calling another user “shitlord”.
Did @eldavi@lemmy.ml report me?
Either way, it was sarcasm
the caustic use of words, often in a humorous way, to mock someone or something
I won’t reveal who reports who, but I will say it was someone else.
The civility rule is NOT ambiguous:
“Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members.”
