• jordanlund@lemmy.world
        shield
        M
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I won’t reveal who reports who, but I will say it was someone else.

        The civility rule is NOT ambiguous:

        “Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members.”

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          All good but this moderation approach is censoring non-problematic content because some people have poor reading comprehension and/or don’t understand sarcasm.

          I would expect them to get better instead of content getting diluted.

          @eldavi@lemmy.ml did confirm that he did not report me, so this is literally some third party injecting themselves into a discussion. Either way, rules can be used by faith actors to stifle speech, that’s how it works on reddit. I would posit context should be counted when issuing removals.

          • jordanlund@lemmy.world
            shield
            M
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It literally doesn’t matter who reported it, you broke the civility rule. Had I come across the comment organically I still would have removed it.

            Don’t attack other users. Full stop.