• Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Depends on how proud they are and if they’d want to retract their statements of going after AI instead of consumers or not.

        • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          I don’t think there’s any pride in it, they are just going after what is the most profitable at any given time.

          That’s exactly why I suspect they will choose to resurrect the Crucial name later, because given a choice between launching a new name nobody knows, or a name people recognise (even if it’s been tarred a bit) then recognised will be the winning and more profitable option.

          That is, if they haven’t sold the Crucial name to someone else first.

          • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            China’s CXMT might go for it. Apparently they are rolling out DDR5 8000+ memory, two or three years from now. They can rebrand as Crucial for the western market, thus using familiarity to push their product.

            “Crucial’s Xtreme Memory Technology will push your Steam Machine beyond the limits, dddduuuuude!” 🤘