• Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Depends on how proud they are and if they’d want to retract their statements of going after AI instead of consumers or not.

    • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I don’t think there’s any pride in it, they are just going after what is the most profitable at any given time.

      That’s exactly why I suspect they will choose to resurrect the Crucial name later, because given a choice between launching a new name nobody knows, or a name people recognise (even if it’s been tarred a bit) then recognised will be the winning and more profitable option.

      That is, if they haven’t sold the Crucial name to someone else first.

      • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        China’s CXMT might go for it. Apparently they are rolling out DDR5 8000+ memory, two or three years from now. They can rebrand as Crucial for the western market, thus using familiarity to push their product.

        “Crucial’s Xtreme Memory Technology will push your Steam Machine beyond the limits, dddduuuuude!” 🤘