SECRETARY OF DEFENSE Pete Hegseth is under increasing fire for a double-tap strike, first reported by The Intercept in early September, in which the U.S. military killed two survivors of the Trump administration’s initial boat strike in the Caribbean on September 2.

The Washington Post recently reported that Hegseth personally ordered the follow-up attack, giving a spoken order “to kill everybody.” Multiple military legal experts, lawmakers, and now confidential sources within the government who spoke with The Intercept say Hegseth’s actions could result in the entire chain of command being investigated for a war crime or outright murder.

“Those directly involved in the strike could be charged with murder under the UCMJ or federal law,” said Todd Huntley, a former Staff Judge Advocate who served as a legal adviser on Joint Special Operations task forces conducting drone strikes in Afghanistan and elsewhere, using shorthand for the Uniform Code of Military Justice. “This is about as clear of a case being patently illegal that subordinates would probably not be able to successfully use a following-orders defense.”

  • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Lol, OK.

    Still waiting for heads to roll for the CIA torture programme. The only person who went to prison was the whistleblower.

    • smeenz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I doubt it. Kegsbreath will just fire everyone involved in the investigation

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    What absolute moron would obey that order?

    I could see how maybe you could believe there was justification for the initial strike but there can be no justification for killing people who are now defenceless. Although why not just board the vessel and take everyone into custody, why instantly resort to deadly force, did they have information that the people on the boat were heavily armed or otherwise able to threaten a US naval vessel?

    • notgivingmynametoamachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I won’t claim to have researched it myself, but I’ve seen about a dozen different people quote the section of military law that talks about illegal orders that are so blatant you don’t need to check or think, they’re illegal, and the example they use is “firing upon the shipwrecked”.

      As in, the order to fire upon the shipwrecked should be immediately known to every Navy personnel as blatantly illegal as a precondition of their service.

      If you’re performing the example for an illegal order, you’re executing illegal orders.

      Edit: and I’m realizing now I responded to the wrong person.

    • warbond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      In my mind the rules are clear on that: to use deadly force there must be an imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm. Potential future harms can’t even begin to be accounted for, so the standard has to be judged with those immediate circumstances in mind.

      Even in that situation there are means to deter a threat or determine a person’s intent prior to employing any sort of lethal force. There’s nothing justifiable about this.

  • NimaMag@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    I found this analysis from former US military lawyers: Link

    TLDR: Anyone who issued or followed these orders can and should be prosecuted for war crimes.

    Pete Hegseth questioned if the US should follow the Geneva Conventions in a book he wrote in 2024 (yikes!): Link

    That is damning.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Although that’s not totally inappropriate (although ideally he would be prosecuted too but for so many things not just this) because it’s also their responsibility to disobey illegal orders.

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    These idiots will never face consequences until the citizens get angry enough to start guillotine trials

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, if any significant pushback ever happens, it’s not going to be 14 years of court cases and bullshit appeals. It’s going to be citizens’ justice.

      I’m not advocating it. I’m just saying that’s how it could play out.

  • demizerone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Y’all mother fuckers ebeying in advance. These assholes will be held accountable. Call your representatives! Don’t assume their power is so great because it’s not!

    • Formfiller@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Our representatives are literally owned by Israel and Israel loves this administration so I doubt we’ll get anything except a congressional hearing where they get a pool noodle beating for an hour or two. Why isn’t Trump in prison? That was a slam dunk case

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Don’t “y’all” me, we ain’t kin and you don’t know me.

      And what I do on Ebay is my own business, Bubba.

    • UltraMagnus@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      You are absolutely right. And even if they only end up charging some random lieutenant at the bottom of the chain, it will send a message to the rest of the troops that they will not be protected from the consequences of their actions.

    • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Except the Democrats have basically just announced they are going to do nothing because their efforts wouldn’t go anywhere. So better off not trying.

  • bthest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Just like the Jan 6 hearings, they will drag it out for political points, but have no intention to seek actual charges, institutional change, military reform or anything.

    It will just be: “Look at all the evil shit they did! Don’t you wish something could be done! Oh well. Also Maduro bad m’kay, drugs bad m’kay, Hamas bad m’kay, we love troops m’kay. Hearing adjourned!”

  • falseWhite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    211
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    100% nothing will happen, or they will just get pardoned. USA is done. Kaput. All hail Nazi USA.

    • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It’s fucking comical how many Americans seem to think that the collapse of their entire legal system is just a blip and there’s a “normal” to go back to.

      It’s a bit like going to see a magician- if you catch a glimpse of how the trick is done, the spell is broken. There’s no going back. Everyone is now fully aware that accountability only exists because of shared suspension of disbelief that it might not. A new administration doesn’t fix this. Your constitution and legislation has been fully exposed as lacking enforcement measures. There isn’t any coming back from that, regardless of who’s in the big chair.

      • bthest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        It’s already been collapsed for years though. Normal people don’t even get trials anymore. We get outrageously high bail amounts and plea-bargains (forced confessions, that’s what they are) so we will spend 2 years in prison instead of 5 awaiting trial.

        Want to prove your innocence even if it means spending years in pretrial jail? Guess what? They’ll end up dismissing the charges a week before your trial starts because they don’t think they’ll get a conviction. You’re not officially acquitted so the prosecutor’s success rate stays high AND you still were imprisoned for years so it’s a win-win for them.

        • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          So to be clear, you’re suggesting the reason for allied forces joining WW2 was to save Germany from itself?

          I’m not disagreeing that Trump will pardon everyone involved, I’m not disagreeing that no other country cares if the US comes out the other end, I’m just saying, these regimes have a history of not sticking around long term. So I’m disagreeing with the statement that “nothing will happen”. Shit is happening and will continue to happen until their reign of terror is brought to an end, just like WW2.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            The thing is that Germany was a land empire; to expand they had to piss off and/or invade their powerful neighbors. America can do whatever the heck it wants and as long as they don’t do something dumb like attack China they’ll be left mostly to their own devices. Hell, I’d bet good money that the EU won’t lift a finger if they annex Greenland. We’re looking at more of a Franco or Sukharto situation.

          • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            It’s not “their” reign of terror. They are a symptom.

            This shit is the fault of all Americans. Those who voted for it, those who enable it, and those who are sitting on their asses either thinking this ends with a new administration or who are waiting for someone else to come put Nazis in the ground for them.

            Blaming this on the Trump admin is like blaming a toddler for bringing a loaded handgun to school.

            The adults in the room number in the hundreds of millions and you’re doing fuck all.

            • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              Your analogy can’t have it both ways. Either the allies saved Germany from itself, implying there was a good portion saved from the fascist portion, OR the Nazi party was the fault of all Germans, those who voted for it, those who enable it, etc., and blaming any portion on Nazis/Hitler is like blaming a toddler. So which is it?

              I’m 86% convinced you’re a divisiveness bot at this point. Prove me wrong.

              • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Germany was saved from itself as an undeserved RESULT of the allies’ victory. The allies didn’t go in to improve the lives of Nazi enabling German citizens, clearly.

                • bthest@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  Isn’t Europe continuing friendly relations with the US also enabling? Can’t you vote in better governments who will draw a line in the sand against America? Still doing military exercises with us? Really? After Denmark was threatened with an invasion of Greenland? Why would Denmark let JD Vance go to Greenland and film a propaganda video while that was happening! Why?! Why let him do that? It’s against Europe’s interest to be in bed with us now. It certainly was considered enabling when they were doing it with Nazi Germany. Besides the way Europe is voting they’re headed down the same path. In 10 years we could have a left-wing America and a fascist Europe.

                  But I mean unlike Nazi Germany, the US is untouchable militarily speaking so it’s a moot point.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      53
      ·
      2 days ago

      Even before the USA was kaput, double tapping became typical US strategy under the Obama administration, which makes me even more confident that nobody will face any consequences for this. To try Trump they’d have to try Obama.

        • alaphic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          55
          ·
          2 days ago

          I really don’t understand why people (GOPers mainly, it seems) trot this line out every time there’s the “threat” of a Repub being (gasp) held accountable for something…

          We don’t fucking CARE! GOOD! Prosecute the criminals! It doesn’t matter what side they’re on politically!

          Some of us don’t hang our hat on individual cults of personality and just want the rules applied equally all the way across. Why is this so difficult to understand?

          • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            For some people, their entire world view revolves around “there must be in-groups to protect and out-groups to bind”. That’s it. Everything else is a polite fiction on top of that.

            These people are, generally, bad people. Like, a child reading about them in a book would point out that they’re not good.

            Many conservatives adhere to this world view.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            We don’t fucking CARE! GOOD! Prosecute the criminals! It doesn’t matter what side they’re on politically!

            You don’t care, but the people in power do. That’s the point I was making.

        • danc4498@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          2 days ago

          And……. Nothing will happen. As both commentators said and are, depressingly, probably correct.

      • arrow74@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I’ve seen this sentiment a lot lately. It’s just a very bad argument.

        We aren’t going to type out a list of every US war criminal ever. We are talking about current events and want the active war criminals stopped.

        Obviously we should try all war criminals, but let’s stop the war crimes first

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s not my point. If Democrats seriously attack Trump on this, he’ll hit back by attacking them for supporting Obama, and establishment Democrats won’t throw their man under the bus. Ergo, nothing will happen. Screw Obama, but that’s not the argument I’m making here.

          Edit: Aaand there it is.