• Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Everyone else surprised that a school district would take any action at all against any bully, let alone one bullying a trans student.

  • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    32 minutes ago

    I think a lot of people have not read the article. Locker rooms/changing rooms are already uncomfortable. If there was a girl in my locker room in school, I would have been uncomfortable to. From the article, I wouldn’t go so far as to call it bullying, and suspending the students, but it’s clear that this is a time to have a talk with them, and if he is willing, the trans student as well.

    In fairness to the school district, they said they would not have suspended the students for something like this, and they are investigating. So chances are there is more that happened than what is in the news cycle.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    This has gone too far. Conservative media has just become purposeless cruelty. Bullying in any form shouldn’t be allowed in school. Its obviously not only inhumane to allow that shit but its a liability for schools.

  • Cocopanda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    This is why I don’t mind the thought of a coming civil war and reliving the monsters. They don’t deserve life for being so evil. People need to get ready for the coming civil war against the Nazi’s.

    • dan1101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      35 minutes ago

      Yeah but the human shit stains will just recede back into the woodwork before they can all be identified.

      • dogerwaul@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        are you referring to socialists and communists and anarchists? because we love guns over here.

  • Devolution@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Oh my god receiving consequences for being a shit head violates my 1st amendment rights!!!

    Fuck them.

        • onslaught545@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          Depends on the situation, but schools act in loco parentis, assuming the responsibility of the parent while the child is in their custody.

          The legal argument, which has been upheld by courts, is that parents don’t have to respect 1st amendment rights regarding the discipline of their children, so therefore schools don’t either.

          And it makes sense if you think about it. A kid shouldn’t be able to disrupt class, sling racial slurs, verbally assault another student or teacher, etc. with impunity. The situation in the article is a prime example of this.

          I also found out the hard way that they don’t have to respect your 5th and 6th amendment rights either, as I was questioned without being read my rights, and that was used against me in court.

          • traceur301@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Have you seen the courts lately? they’ve turned themselves into a farce with ever more flagrant anti-constitutional rulings. Citing them doesn’t hold the gravity it once did

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Holy shit, the unhinged right are masters of making themselves out to be the real victims. What fucking chodes they are.

    • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      And the “left” is sitting back and allowing their country to be steamrolled by these fucking chodes. It’s embarrassing, really.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I dealt with them enough people that my response to crybulling is to laugh in their face and dare them to throw a punch. Which is surprisingly effective when you are a five five dude who pulls off the wildman look quite well.

  • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    In the video, which became public in May, one boy can be heard asking, “There’s a girl in here?” Another adds, “Why is there a girl? I’m so uncomfortable there is a girl.” Their comments prompted another boy to insist that the trans student leave.

    Right wingers see a video on line and assume it’s the full story and get their collective panties in a twist. However, the school district, which cannot legally release any detailed information about the investigation and punishment had this to say:

    “At no time would LCPS suspend a student simply because they expressed some kind of discomfort. A reading of our Title IX resources should make it clear that there is a high bar to launch a Title IX investigation and an even higher bar to determine a student is in violation of Title IX.”

    I’m thinking this went a little bit further than a couple students whining and must have turned a fair bit worse.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Knowing how a good amount of these kids are raised now by right wing assholes, it’s fair to assume thing turned a LOT worse

      • unconsequential@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        13 hours ago

        And right wing iPads. They’re absorbing some really terrible stuff without supervision, or even with mild supervision and guidance it still gets through.

              • magikmw@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                2 hours ago

                My opinion: no. Children under certain age have no capacity to detect malice or disinformation when interacting with others, especially adults and algorithms bent on harm.

                Hell, most adults probably aren’t. But as long as a child has a guardian, it’s the guardian’s responsibility to teach, guide and protect.

                Letting a child lose into the internet is harmful, just like letting one out into a city.

                I don’t think age verification is a particularly good tool to enforce that, but I don’t know what is, on a societal level.

                I do agree with the stated goals tho.

                • unconsequential@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  I agree with this. I don’t think any of the legislation put forward, in multiple countries, with the stated goals of “protecting the children” are actually meant to protect the children. If they were I would indeed support them because I have watched friends struggle with their children. But I’m not entirely sure legislating this problem away is even possible.

                  But parents I know can sit right next to their kids while they have screen time and some of the stuff that gets sent to their children’s devices is questionable. It’s a lot of emotional and mental labor constantly on parents to course correct some of that sometimes sneaky content. And this is a dual working home who are already stretched thin on time and energy. And banning the older children from devices altogether is pretty much impossible because of school and peers.

                  I saw a post the other day and it made a valid point. When we were kids there seemed to be a lot more sites with games and stuff geared toward children like Neopets and I remember Gaiaonline fondly. Were there some questionable things? Sure, it was the Wild West of the Internet and I had like zero and I mean zero supervision online, but there just seemed to be more stuff explicitly for kids. Games, interactive educational sites, chats and forums. Not just “versions” of things for kids.

                  Perhaps I am missing something? Someone please jump in if I am misguided on the apps and sites available today. I would gladly pass that info along to some pairs of parents I know.

  • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    School bullies are tolerated for the same reason police tolerate the proud boys. The Christian agenda is to raise their kids to be Christian Soldiers terrorizing Queer kids and we’re apparently supposed to go along with letting it happen. Fuck that.

  • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    14 hours ago

    If there had been a person with a vagina in the boys locker room in high school, I’d have been happy about that as a teenager.

    At the very least i wouldn’t be butthurt about it. How about we don’t bully people at all, huh?

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      you’d have been happy with one of the popular girls walking in mid change and seeing your shriveled little cock pre-shower?

      that’s kinda weird tbh

    • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Can we not do the “boys should be grateful” thing please? It’s one step away from “Niiiice” and two away from “An erection is consent”. It’s not particularly helpful yo reduce a transmasc to “a person with a vagina” either.