• Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    This paper was published a few years ago. I remember reading through it because it sounded very scary. In its current state I dont think it crosses any ethical bounds as its less than 30days old with no lived experience or consciousness. The ethical line should probably follow whatever the abortion debate defines consciousness as. Which I think is 30 weeks

    It did spark a few ethics papers on the topic which turned out to be a horrible dry boring reads with seemingly no consensus.

    • ryannathans@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The abortion debate is not something we should be basing anything on, before you know it you’ll have to raise these little computers as your children and be charged with murder when they die

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        before you know it you’ll have to raise these little computers as your children and be charged with murder when they die

        If you’re a pro life person then you’d probably consider this a life and consider these experiments murder. If you arent then I dont think you would see this as a conscious human brain. Following the abortion debate doesnt mean we have to take the conservative side it means you probably draw the line here in the same place you draw the line in the abortion debate.