Money quote:

Excel requires some skill to use (to the point where high-level Excel is a competitive sport), and AI is mostly an exercise in deskilling its users and humanity at large.

  • Limonene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Give Microsoft some credit! Excel has been able to come up with wrong answers for decades. For example, reporting 1900 as a leap year.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    There’s an old story about the lead developer at Texas Instruments saying “I want a computer that fits in my pocket”. And then his staff dutifully measured the pocket to spec before proceeding to perform a feat of miniaturization that would revolutionize the modern world.

    I’m trying to imagine one of the techies, from way out in the back, saying “Does it have to get the right answer?” Then getting fired, walking off the job, and walking into Microsoft with 10x the salary the next day.

  • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    There are things that could be done to improve Excel. For instance, fully integrate python and allow it to be used to create custom functions. Then, maybe one day, VBA can ride off into the sunset where it belongs.

    Adding Copilot to Excel is not an improvement because Copilot and all other LLM based platforms frequently barfs out totally incorrect information about how to do something in Excel.

    “You do that using <X> formula.”

    No, I can’t, you worthless pile of shit because THAT FORMULA DOESNT EXIST.

        • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I have a conversation about what I want to do and it provides suggestions and formulas or tools I wasn’t even aware of that stopped up productivity.

            • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              You know it’s easier, efficient and better to have a conversation with an AI rather than read an entire manual that won’t contain the thing you need right?

              You know, all the things it’s advertised to do.

              • rhabarba@feddit.orgOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 days ago

                Only to find the “AI” hallucinating functions that won’t work. Or won’t do the thing you were told they do.

                • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  Most times it works. When it doesn’t, it’ll still get me 90% of a solution and I can use the manual or other means to finish it. Again a much faster and better approach. I don’t need to spend hours of my time reading manuals that barely touch on the knowledge I need just to bash keys and hope for the best. Plus it’s conversational so it engages other parts of the brain as a learning tool.

                  These fucking people use a rubber duck for the same thing

        • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Lemmy is propaganda against AI at this point. Not sure what paid for it but it has all the markers. Feels like being in the comment section of ny post articles.

          Same energy as talking online about immigrants, nuclear energy or marvel

          It’s using a community to post toxic and dystopian articles over and over again. Lemmy technology communitys are extremely vile. Not sure why it happened but it’s turned toxic

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            There isn’t propaganda against AI, it’s totally grassroots because companies are overselling it.

            • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              No it isn’t. There is 100% propaganda and media targeting communities to spread it.

              The Gap between peoples opinion towards AI in everyday life vs people on Lemmy is massive and a good indicator that Lemmy is astroturfed to be toxic towards it. People who are influenced cannot see it, outsiders can though. It’s like seeing right wingers talk about immigrants. They’ll never be able to see how their news and media influence them. That is their truth and it’s as true to them as hate towards AI is towards lemmings in places like c/technology

              Look at the articles posted, the headlines, the appeals used, the comments. It has all the markers of an Astro turf campaign.

              • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 days ago

                The Gap between peoples opinion towards AI in everyday life vs people on Lemmy is massive and a good indicator that Lemmy is astroturfed

                By who? Your conspiracy theory makes no sense. Why would anyone want to do that.

                • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  You really can’t imagine why corporations and political groups who spend billions paying people to manufacture narratives and flood feeds might hate the idea of ordinary people suddenly having their own free, on-demand content factory, fact-checker, and megaphone?

                  That’s on both sides of the political spectrum. These AI tools are not just Google chat. You can build with them rapidly. Is it some revolutionary thing? No

                  But can it be a game changer in some areas? Absolutely.

                  They moved rapidly with the media on this. Compare headlines for AI to any other yellow journalistic topic. They’re identical

  • Honytawk@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Why would anyone use an LLM as calculator?

    That just doesn’t make sense.

    It is like using a calculator as typewriter because it can spell 80085.