Money quote:

Excel requires some skill to use (to the point where high-level Excel is a competitive sport), and AI is mostly an exercise in deskilling its users and humanity at large.

  • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    There are things that could be done to improve Excel. For instance, fully integrate python and allow it to be used to create custom functions. Then, maybe one day, VBA can ride off into the sunset where it belongs.

    Adding Copilot to Excel is not an improvement because Copilot and all other LLM based platforms frequently barfs out totally incorrect information about how to do something in Excel.

    “You do that using <X> formula.”

    No, I can’t, you worthless pile of shit because THAT FORMULA DOESNT EXIST.

        • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Lemmy is propaganda against AI at this point. Not sure what paid for it but it has all the markers. Feels like being in the comment section of ny post articles.

          Same energy as talking online about immigrants, nuclear energy or marvel

          It’s using a community to post toxic and dystopian articles over and over again. Lemmy technology communitys are extremely vile. Not sure why it happened but it’s turned toxic

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            There isn’t propaganda against AI, it’s totally grassroots because companies are overselling it.

            • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              No it isn’t. There is 100% propaganda and media targeting communities to spread it.

              The Gap between peoples opinion towards AI in everyday life vs people on Lemmy is massive and a good indicator that Lemmy is astroturfed to be toxic towards it. People who are influenced cannot see it, outsiders can though. It’s like seeing right wingers talk about immigrants. They’ll never be able to see how their news and media influence them. That is their truth and it’s as true to them as hate towards AI is towards lemmings in places like c/technology

              Look at the articles posted, the headlines, the appeals used, the comments. It has all the markers of an Astro turf campaign.

              • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 days ago

                The Gap between peoples opinion towards AI in everyday life vs people on Lemmy is massive and a good indicator that Lemmy is astroturfed

                By who? Your conspiracy theory makes no sense. Why would anyone want to do that.

                • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  You really can’t imagine why corporations and political groups who spend billions paying people to manufacture narratives and flood feeds might hate the idea of ordinary people suddenly having their own free, on-demand content factory, fact-checker, and megaphone?

                  That’s on both sides of the political spectrum. These AI tools are not just Google chat. You can build with them rapidly. Is it some revolutionary thing? No

                  But can it be a game changer in some areas? Absolutely.

                  They moved rapidly with the media on this. Compare headlines for AI to any other yellow journalistic topic. They’re identical