If it still works for the purpose, it is NOT obsolete.
Stop fetishizing the new.
If it’s connecting to the Internet and not getting security updates, that’s probably not good.
So what you said is mostly true, but there are certainly people running windows XP thinking “I just check my email and read the news, this is fine”
Meh.
If the other layers of security are in place, the risk can be managed.
The problem you describe is from things like that XP user running as admin, a failure of security layering.
Security isn’t just having all the updates, which is the implication statements like this makes.
I have XP VM’s with no service packs that connect to the internet. They’re NAT’ed in VMware to an isolated subnet that has its own firewall. No MS ports are permitted out of that subnet other than RDP, and that only from specific IP addresses. There’s more, but even just this addresses most security concerns.
This is used for testing specific software that only runs on XP.
It’s hilarious that you think someone running XP on the internet knows anything about computer security.
[ring-fenced test-rig for winXP]
It’s hilarious that you think someone running XP on the internet knows anything about computer security.
totally.~
I have to work with some of these machines. When they fail, it’s an ever increasing gamble if we’ll even be able to repair them. I already have to resort to buying parts off eBay “as is” and hoping they work. At some point, there’s not going to be any left and we’ll be utterly fucked.
If it is connected to the internet, and it is not actively receiving updates, it is not working for its purpose.
If it is airgapped from all networks, I agree with you completely.
If it is connected to the internet
Nightmare fuel, at this point. NOTHING but shiny updated firewalls connect to the net themselves.
My oscilloscope still runs on windows 98. Back in it’s days, it cost about as much as a car, and it still works. No reason to throw this standalone machine out.
Go into an average US factory and see how much still runs on 95-Vista
The places I’ve seen in my area from various jobs, including IT and network installation sometimes still ran on an OS that pre-dates fucking DOS for their machinery. 😳
I also recently had to work with a data logger that was from the era of windows 95. Luckily the software attached to it also supported windows 7.
Breaking: Linux Inc. stops support for Linux 2000 at the end of the year. Linux Inc. recommends to upgrade to Linux 25, integrating new AI features including an AI agent that will enhance the computer experience drastically. Devices that run Linux 2000 won’t get any more security patches after Dec 31.
I work with a lot of industrial machines that use all sorts of weird old computers most have been running pretty much non stop for 20-30 years. HP unix, Irix, solaris and windows NT are the least obscure computers I come across. Every week it seems like i run into something new (old). We have a few running on PC98s with a weird english version of J-DOS, computers with RTOS’s like QNX and LynxOS and probably some other shit that i have yet to encounter.
Sadly newer machines just run windows or in a few lucky cases linux. The IT department always trys to manage the windows machines hooked up to the network and breaks them with their anti virus spyware crap.
What a rarity. Another speaker of the forgotten magic… AIX, SunOS, and DEC Alpha to you my friend.
I’m missing those from my collection.
