• jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      If it’s connecting to the Internet and not getting security updates, that’s probably not good.

      So what you said is mostly true, but there are certainly people running windows XP thinking “I just check my email and read the news, this is fine”

      • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Meh.

        If the other layers of security are in place, the risk can be managed.

        The problem you describe is from things like that XP user running as admin, a failure of security layering.

        Security isn’t just having all the updates, which is the implication statements like this makes.

        I have XP VM’s with no service packs that connect to the internet. They’re NAT’ed in VMware to an isolated subnet that has its own firewall. No MS ports are permitted out of that subnet other than RDP, and that only from specific IP addresses. There’s more, but even just this addresses most security concerns.

        This is used for testing specific software that only runs on XP.

          • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            [ring-fenced test-rig for winXP]

            It’s hilarious that you think someone running XP on the internet knows anything about computer security.

            totally.~

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      If it is connected to the internet, and it is not actively receiving updates, it is not working for its purpose.

      If it is airgapped from all networks, I agree with you completely.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        If it is connected to the internet

        Nightmare fuel, at this point. NOTHING but shiny updated firewalls connect to the net themselves.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s easier to write “obsolete” than it is “single purpose computer often loaded with technical debt and risk”. A computer is meant as a general purpose device. If it can only do one, it’s mostly obsolete anyhow

      • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        That depends on how many things you NEED it to do. My kitchen knife is not more obsolete than my air fryer just because it does fewer things.

        And this is a misuse of the term technical debt. Technical debt does not mean OLD. Finished software from the 80s that was complete and bug free has no technical debt. New software almost UNIVERSALLY has more technical debt than older software because nobody has cleaned up the first draft yet. A continuing, rolling package of spaghetti code, patches, unvetted dependencies, and jammed in features that are sold for subscription fee purposes rather than customer need is OVERFLOWING with it. That’s what “move fast and break things” MEANS.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Your kitchen knife is not a computer.

          Software is never without bugs. Baffling you’d say otherwise. And I was referring to the many situations where companies used outdated computer systems for many years even though it causes extra work for employees. Absolutely textbook tech debt.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    My oscilloscope still runs on windows 98. Back in it’s days, it cost about as much as a car, and it still works. No reason to throw this standalone machine out.

  • gigachad@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Breaking: Linux Inc. stops support for Linux 2000 at the end of the year. Linux Inc. recommends to upgrade to Linux 25, integrating new AI features including an AI agent that will enhance the computer experience drastically. Devices that run Linux 2000 won’t get any more security patches after Dec 31.

  • PacMan@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Man I don’t know how they do it. The memory leaks in those old Windows versions were crazy! I don’t miss the weekly reboots on all of our Citrix servers. It could be yearsly but you know monthly for patching

  • hardcoreufo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I work with a lot of industrial machines that use all sorts of weird old computers most have been running pretty much non stop for 20-30 years. HP unix, Irix, solaris and windows NT are the least obscure computers I come across. Every week it seems like i run into something new (old). We have a few running on PC98s with a weird english version of J-DOS, computers with RTOS’s like QNX and LynxOS and probably some other shit that i have yet to encounter.

    Sadly newer machines just run windows or in a few lucky cases linux. The IT department always trys to manage the windows machines hooked up to the network and breaks them with their anti virus spyware crap.