• scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Meanwhile, the woman in front of him is seemingly holding his hand, but the headband of the woman behind her is somehow over her wrist.

    I’ll never understand how a statistical model for “next most probable pixel” can arrive at shit like this.

    • toad31@lemmy.cif.su
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      I’ll never understand how a statistical model for “next most probable pixel” can arrive at shit like this.

      Probably because you have no experience writing or reading code for AI. I doubt you’ve read a single book on AI or taken any classes related to it.

      Why would you think you could understand this? Dunning-Kruger effect?

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I’m still in awe how it gets things correct from randomness. Even the early stages years ago that were obviously bad still would get close to the idea, and now it’s not that easy to determine some video origins.

      I’m not talking about the morality and ethics of how it got here, but the science of how it works.

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Yes and I’ve still never understood how text-clawed LLM chat bots and image generator AI seemed to reach these breakthroughs at the same time, or how they are related, under the sheet.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        It looks like she’s holding the lower left hand corner of the sign and his hand overlaps hers slightly, that doesn’t look generated.

        But that doesn’t explain her bracelet slipping off onto the other womans head, or his weirdly shaped arm where his tattoo is by his watch.

        • fartographer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Try overlapping your fingers the way shown in the picture. Unless there’s something special or wrong with my hand, I can only overlap my fingers that way from pinky to pointer. And if you look at the bottom, it looks like there’s a thumb wrapping around.

          Which means that’s not his right hand, it’s his left hand upside down. But we can see that his left hand is on the right side of the sign—it’s the one with a pointer that looks like a cross between ET’s finger and a penis.

          • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            20 hours ago

            His thumb would be behind the sign somewhere around the “h”. Then you have his four fingers.

            Her hand starts right below his pinkie finger and it’s her thumb curled up underneath the sign.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Looks like it could be that one’s wearing a bracelet and the other’s wearing a headband and the two are just coincidentally lining up.

          Frankly, I think this kind of CSI “zoom and enhance!” analysis is kind of silly generally speaking. Does it matter if these images are AI generated? Does Will Smith matter?

          Maybe this is AI-generated. Could be. Maybe it’s real, could also be. None of the “defects” seem particularly egregious. But at the end of the day I don’t see how it’s going to change anything of any significance either way.

      • eezeebee@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        18 hours ago

        It’s because they’re stupid and they believe they’re smarter than us.

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I chalk it up to ye olde statistics and having to view data as a matrix or tensor of bytes lol