Yeah. That makes sense. But given the extract of the article says the uk didn’t take it seriously makes it seem that this “discussion” probably amounted to a proposal by openAI the uk asking how much, and then openAI giving a price. With no further discussion after that.
Those close to the discussion say Kyle never really took the idea seriously, not least because it could have cost as much as £2bn
It’s a non story. Sounds like someone from openai proposed it in a more broad conversation, the minister asked how much and that was it.
Nice steady revenue stream. I don’t think they’re profitable so are clearly looking for more money.
Those close to the discussion say Kyle never really took the idea seriously, not least because it could have cost as much as £2bn
Discussion
OpenAI: We could give everyone in the UK premium access for 2 billion a year.
Minister: Lol fuck off.
end discussion
Media
Look how the government is discussing wasting money on this they’ll do cuts and raise taxes.
But asking who he was helps me to know if it’s worth clicking.
You expect me to read an article about the death of some random guy I’ve never heard of?
Could someone explain to a non American who this was and what he did?
Also it’s much easier to triple a small number than a big one.