Or they meant “rights” of their investors to profit from whatever they bought.

Makes sense, guns got greater availability and much lower barrier for entry

Because it’s an overused term that I’m tired of seeing everywhere. Machine learning, image recognition are both nicer and more specific.

edit: my problem is that whenever someone says “AI”, without much other context, you have no idea if you’re talking to someone who actually knows a thing or two or the biggest moronic llm investor on the planet. Being more specific shows that you’re not the latter.

lol as if the US has many non-standard fpv jammers, especially somewhere terrorists would strike

I think it’s mostly training and payload availability.

I don’t see why they would spend extra on a fancy “ai” drone when they could use a pilot and place him far away. Spend the savings on more drones, payloads, non-standard frequency hardware.

There’s a tiny part of me that wishes they’d start wrecking shit it as a wake-up call to the country, but (in a perfect world) without casualties.

Fun fact, previous Mazda 2 was sold as a Yaris in the US, then they swapped and the new Yaris is sold as a Mazda 2 in some european countries