

Apparently he used systematic-de-registration-of-Democrat-voters, to help swing the last election…
No need for war for 2026, with systematic-de-registration already in-play ( he even openly promised he would “wipe the blue-states off the map”, which is exactly what removing blue-votes does ).
War’d then be needed as a “lever” only for 2028.
That’s when he’ll declare war against Canada, -/+ 1y.
_ /\ _
There is a fallacy underlying the quoted-meaning, & an error…
Ukraine’s war is now drone-dominated, ttbomk ( I’m including land, sea, & air drones ), so the genociding of Palestinians isn’t the only drone-dominated war happening, ttbomk…
The fallacy, though, is that the wielder-of-the-weapons not being in the battlefield, somehow means that the country, or people of the wielders are not at risk:
The enemy can bomb one while one is wielding drones, why not?
The enemy can wield their-own drones against one, while one is wielding drones against them, why not?
Just because one isn’t at “the front” doesn’t mean that one is safe, when both sides are wielding drones.
Yes it does de-couple risk from fighting, for any aggressor, but de-coupling it doesn’t mean that opponent striking one somehow ceases to happen, it just converts it more into a tech-heavy cat-&-mouse game…
_ /\ _