You know, they used to not separate sports by gender, until the ladies started beating the men. Then all of a sudden, nah we gotta split em up. So, even if their argument had any kind of validity, it still doesn’t.

Isn’t she just talking truthfully? Is the truth disparaging, if it is, isn’t it of their own making, how is she to discern, I doubt they have a bar they wouldn’t go below, even they wouldn’t be able to point to the line where something is truthful but disparaging, if that’s a possible description, because doesn’t that then just become a retelling of the facts? Anyone would be hard pressed to find something above board, or even slightly ok about fb. Not even one, non disparaging description or thing, exisits relating to fb. I haven’t read the book, I’m just going by what Zuck has publicly said and done, too.

They’ll try and pin any excuse, on furthering their agenda, even if it has zero data or evidence to support it. Just because you’re terrified of things you don’t understand, Mr distraction, doesn’t mean those things are terrorists. It’s just you.

The game was always rigged against us.

When restrictions hit the UK, massive spikes in VPN use were seen. Why was that. Dude, vpns are well known by anyone who uses the internet in any form. They’re everywhere, they advertise themselves in feeds. You have to be a special level of obtuse to not know what they are.

Wow, inferring an entire populous is ignorant, that’s pretty low, my friend.

Word coming out of Nepal is suggesting that this wasn’t / isn’t about social media, it’s just being reframed as such to minimise what’s happening, as if it’s just silly kids (being that it’s Gen z and Gen alpha) who can’t cope without social media. But what happened was the two party system they’ve been running on, since abolishing the monarchy, formed a coalition and then ran everything so as to profit for themselves, and flaunted that lavish lifestyle, while there were no jobs and they’d cut all essential services to the people. People were having to travel to other countries for jobs and send money home for their families. The nepo baby hashtags are the politicians kids, flaunting their lavish lifestyles. The people could have just used vpns, it’s not about the social media ban, main stream media is trying to quash what’s happening in case other people who are currently similarly oppressed, become emboldened by what’s happening in Nepal. Their government is very corrupt.

This is not about social media bans, it’s against the corrupt government. It’s being reframed. If you think about it, if the only problem was social media ban, they’d just all get vpns. They’re not stupid. They’re trying to frame it as silly kids, (because they’re all gen z and Gen alpha, in their school uniforms, so as to be less likely to be shot) who can’t live without social media. But it’s not, it’s protesting deep government corruption. If word gets out that it’s a protest against government corruption, other people facing similar oppression, may become emboldened, so it’s being buried.

What’s hilarious is, in most instances, if the humans boycott the company, they die. But they’re so out of touch and so far up their own arses sniffing their own farts, surrounded by yes men, they forgot what reality is.