I’m sure they also trained their models on all the content at the same time too.

it won’t because it’s an illusion of a test with unverifiable results.

Imagine this, you want to know if you have cancer. you can get results from a biopsy, blood tests, and an MRI. all results are validated by specialist review. it will take 3 months to collect and validate the results. OR, you can run all your tests above and have results in 24 hours but they aren’t validated by a specialist.

so the question is, why does it take 3 months and how can we make it shorter without decreasing quality, validity, or consistency?

AI is not the answer.

woosh

I think you might have been too young to remember the Regan years.

not nearly as tumultuous as today, but certainly similar in spirit.

yeah! let’s go back to a time when gas was $12 a gallon. where women had two jobs, making babies and making dinner. where teen pregnancy was at its highest ever. where the government fueled a drug and arms war in South America. where the constant threat of thermonuclear war was banging on the iron dome every single day.

yeah…sounds like a fuckin blast from the past. fuckin rad.

this is bullshit.

the study was performed by Navinci Diagnostics, which has a vested interest in the use of technological diagnostic tools like AI.

the only way to truly identify cancer is through physical examination and tests. instead of wasting resources on AI we should improve early detection through improved efficiency of tests, allowing patients to regularly test more often and cheaper.

more like SQLAlchemy is always “carshing”.

rails, although slow, is pretty damn stable if your code isn’t absolute trash.

it’s always licensing costs.

don’t know how this is legal yet pirating software is illegal.