Nice baseless and completely inaccurate strawman you made there.

“not letting shit continue to backslide.”

That’s Kamala? That’s promising the most lethal military to a crowd demanding the end of genocide? That’s not letting shit continue to backslide?

Jill Stein is trapped in a room. She has a gun with three bullets loaded. Beside her stands a democrat, a fascist, an anarchist, and Karl Marx. What does she do? She hands the gun to the fascist.

I didn’t vote for Jill Stein. The lack of another viable candidate isn’t reason to vote the way you did. Dice it however you want, you didn’t vote for imperfect, you voted explicitly in support of genocide.

What you should have done, what the country still fails to recognize, is demand a viable candidate, or (at this point both parties are so complicity there is no other option) revolt. But that’s too uncomfortable, and it’s still only brown people getting slaughtered and rounded up for death camps domestically, so you’ll sit on your ass watching TV until you’re tired every night instead of revolting.

When they finally come for you, they’ll be no one left to fight with you, and you’ll have complete deserved it, you spent your time blaming people who tried to fight back. Go ahead, become a Newsom cheerleader for a few more years, that’ll save the country.

Brain rot.

You’ve learned nothing since the election. Fuck your grocery bill, you deserve it for being okay with the other non viable genocidal candidate.

It’s those principled citizens who don’t deserve it, and they’re the ones that will be on the front lines when it comes down to it, you’ll just continue barking at them and when you experience the effects of civil war for the first time, you’ll respond the same way: you’ll blame those who actually resisted and fought back for starting a war, instead of voting for Newsom or whoever the fuck Democrat you think will save this collapsing empire.

Read some books. Start with Manufacturing Consent and the Orientalism, but you’ll need some capacity for empathy towards people outside your country first.

And that right there is what makes it a legal system only and not a justice system. They don’t pursue cases where someone was wronged, they pursue cases where they can build their careers on wins.

1. It wasn’t my suggestion.
2. I do see the potential negative subtext, but they didn’t mention Jews. You’re the only one that connected Israel with all Jews, and that is antisemitism.

It’s completely valid to say “actually, I think any proceeds should go to the original victims if we can identify them today”, but that’s not what you said, you said it’s antisemitism to suggest giving it to specifically Palestinians. Would you have called it antisemitic if they suggested giving the money to doctors without borders?

You can disagree with the allocation of the proceeds, or the idea is selling the art in the first place, but you immediately jumped to accusation is antisemitism because Palestinians were involved.

Your membership in the Democrats cult is more important to you than literally opposing genocide on your dime. If they flipped on abortion tomorrow, you’d be telling “abortion one issue voters” to fuck off too, as long as you get your comfort we should all put our heads in the guillotine and vote for your genocidal party because you insist your concerns are more important than children being starved shredded to pieced.

You still haven’t identified the antisemitism. You dislike using the funds to support Palestine, but you failed to articulate why using the funds from the proceeds of selling art stolen by Nazis to support a community currently experiencing a Holocaust by modern Nazis is antisemitism.

The state is Israel historically collaborated with Nazis and have publicly stated that the antisemites of the world will be their allies, what’s more pro semitic than supporting the semitic victims (Palestinians) of the allies of antisemites?

Initial setup is the only real time investment. Once you have the final edited video exported, uploading it to multiple platforms doesn’t take much more time. It does take away ad impressions from YouTube, though.

Because they do actually do it for the money. It’s a job, and if they put the same content on a non monetized platform, they would drive they’re own viewers away from their own monetized platform = less money.

deleted by creator

The truth is innovation has always thrived most when knowledge is shared. Open scientific collaboration, communal traditions, and open-source projects show that people create because of curiosity, necessity, and the desire to contribute to something larger than themselves. Profit may push some short-term developments, but the deepest breakthroughs often come from cooperation and the joy of discovery. Human creativity has never needed private ownership to flourish; it has always been strongest when ideas circulate freely, building on each other without artificial barriers.

We’ve been conditioned to believe innovators only innovate for profit. You wouldn’t need protection from copycats if we didn’t have capitalism.

Because they keep buying shit they don’t need and hording it in the garage, while their car sits outside in the driveway exposed to the elements.

Hyperinflation and incoming recession aside, Americans have been using their garages for junk storage for many decades.

The whole idea of intellectual property is bonkers. Imagine charging people for hearing your voice, that’s the logical conclusion of monetizing intellectual property.

Capitalism needs to die.

No, but it’s good to be actually informed and be able to distinguish between valuable information and propaganda. Why are they selling you fake news, what narrative are they trying to support?

All available evidence suggests they take maintaining their nuclear stockpile very seriously, and they’re possibly actively expanding it.

https://www.businessinsider.com/satellite-photos-show-russias-upgrades-to-nuclear-bases-near-nato-2025-7

Besides, let’s take it even further, let’s say they only have 30% of their stockpile in working order, would you like to stand on the other side of that?

Oh no they can’t produce and they don’t maintain their stockpile and they only have OVER 1,000 nuclear warheads… they are a nuclear superpower.

Willing to bet at least 30% is not functional? Based on what?

What do you mean? They have everything they need to make nuclear weapons domestically, they can easily make HEU bombs today, and with some effort and time and money, they can domestically enrich Plutonium too.

What materials and resources would they lack?