The homeowner told police the two men said they were police and claimed they were at the home to serve a warrant.

[The homeowner] became suspicious, because, you know, they have a ring camera too, and the suspects were saying they had a warrant, but it was just two people and they’re masked up and no police cars, no lights or anything like that," said Lt. Khan with HPD.

At some point, police said the men shot at the homeowner through the door, prompting the homeowner to return fire.

The homeowner was not hurt in the gunfire, but the two men were both hit and pronounced dead at the scene.

  • _stranger_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    131
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I feel the headline should have noted that he shot in response to them shooting through his goddamn door first.

    • notarobot@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I dont think it matters. The title conveys the idea that they weren’t police. I think you could claim self defense just by that. No one that wants you to open the door falsely claiming to be policie is NOT going to hurt you

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        It’s a huge difference. It may not seem different to you and I, but shooting someone who shoots you first is more universally viewed as acceptable self defense than only shooting people claiming to be police in skimasks on your doorstep. The headline buries the lede.