misk@piefed.social to Technology@lemmy.zipEnglish · 5 days agoGoogle Not Required to Sell Chrome in Court Antitrust Rulingwww.bloomberg.comexternal-linkmessage-square5linkfedilinkarrow-up129arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up128arrow-down1external-linkGoogle Not Required to Sell Chrome in Court Antitrust Rulingwww.bloomberg.commisk@piefed.social to Technology@lemmy.zipEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square5linkfedilinkfile-text
Archive: https://archive.ph/2025.09.02-212946/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-09-02/google-not-required-to-sell-chrome-in-court-antitrust-ruling
minus-squareMCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 days agoDoes this mean that Mozilla will continue to receive money from Google?
minus-squarecryptiod137@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 days agoThey ruled that they are still allowed to pay at least, so I assume it will keep going https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2025/09/google-antitrust-ruling-firefox-search-deal
minus-squareYozul@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 days agoThat’s a separate point in the same case, but yes. The judge also ruled to allow google to keep paying for search engine placement.
Does this mean that Mozilla will continue to receive money from Google?
They ruled that they are still allowed to pay at least, so I assume it will keep going
https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2025/09/google-antitrust-ruling-firefox-search-deal
That’s a separate point in the same case, but yes. The judge also ruled to allow google to keep paying for search engine placement.