Air travelers in the U.S. without a REAL ID will be charged a $45 fee beginning in February, the Transportation Security Administration announced Monday.

The updated ID has been required since May, but passengers without it have so far been allowed to clear security with additional screening and a warning. The Department of Homeland Security says 94% of passengers are already compliant and that the new fee is intended to encourage travelers to obtain the ID.

REAL ID is a federally compliant state-issued license or identification card that meets enhanced requirements mandated in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

  • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    2 days ago

    Like someone else said in a different post yesterday: anything beyond checking that I don’t have weapons or some other danger to the flight is completely unnecessary. There is no reason that the TSA needs to verify identity for flights.

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Just another step towards internal passports, which are a popular measure in most totalitarian states.

    • Doug Holland@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      It has nothing to do with security, everything to do with Big Brotherhood. They love having a database of everyone’s travels.

    • DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 days ago

      Technically its for the surveillance system they set up without telling anybody on top of the surveillance systems already in place that you dont know about on top of the NSA

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Identity is one of those “danger to the flight” things. Like the 9/11 hijackers didn’t bring any weapons on board, they just used force and exploited the compliance of the crew to take control. So if they flag you as a known terrorist, they stop you getting on the plane.

      In theory. In practice I don’t think the TSA has stopped a single attempt of terrorism, but I also don’t think we’ve had any attempts since 9/11. Whether that’s due to the existence of the TSA is impossible to say.

      • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        They may have just used force to take the planes, but regulations regarding cockpit security were completely revolutionized after 9/11. That same tactic should not work today. Hell, even having a weapon doesn’t really make a hijacking more likely.

        The problem was insecure cockpits, not that the authorities didn’t know the identities of the people onboard. There is no actual proven security reason for the TSA collecting this information.

        • Dogyote@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          There is no actual proven security reason for the TSA collecting this information.

          That doesn’t sound right. If there’s a list of wanted or potentially dangerous terrorists or criminals, and I provide ID showing that I am not one of those people, isn’t that a security reason for showing ID?

          • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Who makes that list? The same group of people labeling antifa as terrorists? If a person has no weapons and still is “too dangerous” to be on a plane, why are they not in jail?

            ID isn’t making anything more secure in the context of the airport, it’s just surveillance and another way to limit/punish people extrajudicially.

            • Dogyote@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              22 hours ago

              If a person has no weapons and still is “too dangerous” to be on a plane, why are they not in jail?

              I think that’s the point, they’ll get arrested if they try to fly. Doesn’t that make things more secure?

              • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                20 hours ago

                Sure, if the no fly list was made by putting evidence in front of a judge. It’s not though, people end up on there without being in legal trouble all the time. It can and has been used for political ends, and the lack of transparency makes it effectively useless.