• NABDad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    4 days ago

    It’s true! If they hadn’t waited for permission from the U.S. to help Ukraine, Ukraine would be in Moscow by now.

  • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yes, true.

    US would have wanted Ukraine’s faster capitulation, because their president is Russian asset being blackmailed by decades of pedo stuff and pee tapes.

    • mgnome@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Oh boy, the American politics regarding Ukraine.

      Previous guy in charge was one of the most vocal proponents of Ukrainian dearmament back in 90’s, and since '22 has gone with “help them just enough to survive, so that neither side wins” (probably initiative of Jakie, the Kissinger’s student).

      And the guy now in charge somehow managed to be even worse.

  • Stubb@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’d say there is some truth in that; Russia has gained momentum and Pokrovsk will very likely fall soon — Europe isn’t aiding Ukraine because it cares about the people there, let’s establish that, they’ve shown their humanity with Gaza, they have their own imperialistic aims — to prevent this they need American support —more so since Russia’s state run military complex is outdoing the EU’s production combined — which will, in my opinion, only start another American war that never goes anywhere, only bringing suffering to Ukrainians. Ukrainian army’s morale is down, at least from what I hear, recruitment is forced, protests are breaking out, Zelensky isn’t getting re-elected after the war ends and he says he won’t give one inch of land; the war will persist, should he surrender? I don’t know, I’m not the Ukrainian people, but I don’t know what else they can do right now. I just hope the Ukrainian people won’t suffer.