• henfredemars@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    3 days ago

    Note that the legal framework for phasing out the coin is entirely absent. This was an illegal act as well because only Congress determines what money exists and will be used according to the Constitution.

    • IronBird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      the constitution hasnt mattered for over 20 years now, glad your finally waking up to that fact now though

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      It still exists and can still be used. They’re just not making more of them.

      • Taldan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        You’re missing the point because they didn’t use precise language

        Congress establishes what coins and bills are to be minted. The executive branch executes that directive. Congress has directed the executive branch to mint pennies. The executive branch determined 0 is a number of pennies to mint. The Mint is not minting pennies, despite congress directing them to do so

        If the president is allowed to interpret laws congress passes so broadly, it gives an incredible amount of power to the executive branch. Historically, the president hasn’t been given nearly that level of authority

        It’s illegal because congress said to mint pennies, but the executive branch is not minting pennies

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          The mint doesn’t continuously produce all coins at all times. They produce them in response to coinage needs.

          Most people are using bills or digital payments, so coinage is down across the board. Inflation means the penny is worth so much less that it’s infrequently used, so there’s no point in minting new ones right now. If there is a need, they’ll start minting again.

          • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Manufacturing capability is not the problem, the problem is executive overreach in every aspect of our nation and lack of consequence for those breaking the law.

    • foodandart@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      3 days ago

      More to the point, it isn’t sensible.

      A penny lasts decades as a tangible item of currency. I have pennies in my change purse right now that were struck in the 1960’s.

      The value isn’t in how much it costs to make it but in how long it lasts as usable token of trade.

      • makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        How long it lasts as a usable token of trade

        So it’s still worthless. Genuinely, what can a penny purchase? A nickel? A dime? None of these coins can buy something individually, and a large chunk of the population doesn’t carry them because the utility they gain for having exact change is less than the coins are worth

        To be clear, I understand the coins vs. bills argument, but I’m personally in favor of cutting all coins up to the quarter. Or cutting all coins except dimes and half dollars, but dimes are annoying coins

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I prefer redecimalization. Just redesign money with a zero chopped off. Also get rid of the $1 bill and replace it with a coin. This would make the coins represent the current value of 10c, 50c, $1, $2.5, (maybe $5), and $10, with bills for $20, $50, $100, $200, and $1000. Bills would be representing amounts of money that while commonly exchanged, isn’t actively everyday transaction amounts, those would be represented by coinage.

          It’s similar to the current situation with yen, where usually you’re rooting in your pocket to pay for something small, not opening your wallet. Though for the life of me I can’t understand why the 1¥ coin remains

          • makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            I appreciate trying to save resources here, but Americans are way too fucking stupid for that to work, amid a myriad of other issues I see with this

            • frongt@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              They’d get over it. Just give it a new name and they’ll figure it out eventually.

              I’m sure there will be some holdouts, but that’s not exclusive to Americans.

          • Hawke@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            That’s not what decimalization means. We’re already on the decimal system, it’s not possible to decimalize again.

            You’re thinking of revaluation

      • Taldan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        At this point most people just throw pennies away. At best they’re being saved in a change jar to be brought to the bank. Almost no one is using pennies for payment of goods and services. It’s a useless waste of money to produce and congress should have gotten rid of them decades ago

        The only issue here is that it isn’t congress getting rid of it. It’s the president taking power from congress to get rid of it

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, but like, is it a valuable token of trade? It’s 1c, yes that’s money, its a whole percent of a dollar, but it’s illegal in most of the country to pay someone less than 12.5 of them per minute of labor, an unlivably low wage. The $15/hr wage is increasingly normal for low skilled labor and is a quarter a minute. A quarter is great as you don’t need to fill your pocket with it to buy something from a vending machine. Ok that’s not the most honest comparison as vending machines haven’t taken pennies in at least a decade. It’s a denomination sufficiently small to cause a lot of people to just not bother with them, they just aren’t worth the time to use them or keep track of them.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yes and it needs to be done legally. Granted though it needs to be at least 5x as long as other currency. Its not that I don’t think the penny should be taken out as much as it should be done appropriately.

      • workerONE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Pennies are produced and put into circulation, but people are not saving them and exchanging them for dollars, and they don’t spend them again. They are constantly being produced and lost. Maybe in the 1960s people felt the need to gather their pennies for reuse but not today.

        • foodandart@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I guess. It all depends on whether or not you can afford to igonore pennies.

          If I can not have to break down a dollar bill by fishing 54 cents - two quarters and 4 pennies out of my change purse, I’ll do it.

          I’ve found that it’s when people break bigger bills down, that smaller notes tend to disappear faster.

          This is what the term “nickel and diming” is about… It’s getting you to give up more money in total by taking smaller amounts more often.

          It is a thing that’s real.

          The flip-side of that is what happens with getting paid daily, weekly, bi-weekly and monthly. It’s the day labor that ends up constantly skint, because they weren’t dealing with large whole number balances. Even getting paid weekly, I was saving less than when I went to every two weeks. Now that I’m self-employed, I choose when to bill, and I do so monthly. Get BIG checks and sink it all straight into savings. Because I am paid every 4 weeks, I have to change how I spend and spend less and save more. LOTS more.

          Pennies count at that point. Critically.

          I’ve yet to earn more than 35k in a year - (and that was years ago) - and the biggest thing is havng a balance and seeing that numnber in the savings account rise. I have found that sticking to large lump sums - psychologicaly, you want to hold onto it more and it does change how you aproach savings and money in general.

          I can take a couple hundred dollar bills and slip them into a book on the shelf and they’ll sit there for months before I dig them out. I can try the same thing with 5 20 dollar bills and they’re usually gone within a week.