• Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t even visit news sites, just about every major site has an rss. I simpy load my reader, refresh it and read the news without any annoyances.

  • crocswithsocks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I dropped NYT a while back and switched to APNews. Ive been pretty happy with them. I see that they are dropping readership too. Any reason why?

  • FarraigePlaisteaċ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I forgot about the paywall and assumed this was due to their international reputational damage, over things like their pro-Israel “reporting” of the occupations in Palestine.

  • Microw@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I was confused there for a second but apparently the BBC has introduced a paywall only for US users. Site is still completely free to read anywhere else, which is why I didnt even realize that there is a paywall.

    Which of course means that US Americans could simply VPN their way around it…

    • LemmyThinkAboutThat@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      This screenshot is from July 2025 when I got hit with a paywall and was served with a ton of cookies, so I set my VPN to UK, lol.

      EDIT: This was around the same time as POTUS hit UK with tariffs.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        The BBC has been run as a business now and it’s absolutely stupid. It was never meant to make a profit that was never really the point. It was supposed to be a public service and a projection of soft power, that seems to have gone out to the window now.

        I suspect a lot of the work at the BBC don’t actually agree with this, but management don’t listen to anyone.

    • dan1101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I read an article that suggests classified ads used to support newspapers and hard journalism, and the Internet and sites like Craigslist took away that revenue to pay reporters.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I don’t know though papers like the daily mail will rags even back in the 90s. Those people will never journalists.

      • ominouslemon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yep that’s pretty much how it went. Also print ads have lost against digital ads, which pay way less money to publishers and keep paying less each year