• Cort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Planes don’t have to maintain the sky, but trains need to maintain the rails.

    Essentially any costs that can be externalized & paid by the public with air travel have been, like maintaining airports, etc.

      • Renohren@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Yeah, but from A to B the plane does not use man made infrastructure and planes are for longer journeys than typical trains. Two airports cost a lot less than the constant maintenance of hundreds of miles of tracks, signaling, crossings, bridges and tunnels, forest overgrowth etc. plus the road infrastructure needed to maintain all parts of the train track corridor, even if it’s a dirt road, it needs minimum maintenance.

    • Nighed@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      You are correct, but I think the airports are privately owned though, it’s just they need a lot less to maintain them in relative terms.