• venusaur@lemmy.worldBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    Sounds good. Put a watermark on it if it has a filter or otherwise manipulated.

    • klammeraffe@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      25 days ago

      How about one of those sliders where you reveal the original image and it can be half and half? Make it a capital crime not to do it. Auto-levels with no original? Straight to jail.

    • ℓostme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      if the law applied exactly as the person above you described, it would be utterly useless, because every single photo you’ll see online would be marked as manipulated. people don’t post raw sensor data, online platforms don’t accept raw sensor data, in many cases it’s difficult to even get the data raw and not as a jpeg

      • venusaur@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        25 days ago

        There’s a reasonable threshold. I’m just playing along with devil’s advocate.