• captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    MIT is in a unique position to negotiate here though as that funding is a bargain for the US. And honestly MIT’s reputation and capacity to attract the global top talent in stem will remain long after a funding battle unless they trash it.

      • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        MIT will outlast the administration, is the idea. And if (and when) the pendulum swings, they don’t want to have tarnished their otherwise impeccable reputation by capitulating.

        • BanMe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Unlike a number of other schools, some of which (Berkeley) are downright pathetic.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah being ranked as one of the best schools in the world will hopefully help them gain leverage. On the world stage there are only a few U.S. schools that say “the U.S. is still good at things” and letting MIT fall from those positions will make the U.S. look like their re-imagining of education is the complete failure we all know it is going to be. Would someone else take their place, yes. Will they be from the U.S., no. I was hoping UCF would reach that point somewhere along the line, but I’m biased and I think they got a boot on their neck for the last number of years that stopped them from research growth and diverted it to stupid Desantis shit.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s not even that, MIT has this reputation because they produce results. They’re well known to be the upstream source of massive amounts of technological innovation with all the financial benefits that comes with