• CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s self serving, of course. China doesn’t want to continue its dependence on foreign fossil fuels. Any country that’s an energy importer should be thinking the same way.

    Once built, clean energy tends to be cheap on a per-kWh basis.

    • compostgoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      Meh, as long as they’re building it, whatever gets them to do it is fine with me. I care less about their motivation than I do about keeping as much fossil fuel in the ground as possible

        • compostgoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yep, and it’s a stupid ass decision. Even if you bought into the idea that America needs to be dominant in the energy sector for the next century, they’re completely ceding that position to China. The future of energy is not in combustion, it’s in renewables. And America seems to have no desire to lead the world on that front

          • shalafi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’m no tankie, but I’ve been saying for well over a decade, the 21st century is China’s century. It’s just history. America has fallen, China has been rising, and China has been planning and governing for a decades-long uprising.

      • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I think it’s coal that they’re really trying to get off of.

        Also I think the further down the list you go, the more the country is dependent on imports. SA is the top, they export the most; China is a net importer. Isn’t it?