• Nate Cox@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      105
      ·
      2 days ago

      The biggest band out of Bristol have told their record label to pull all their songs from music streaming app Spotify, in protest at its founder investing more than £500 million in a military AI company

    • nnullzz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      2 days ago

      They’ve been changing their terms of service over the past year with some shady stuff and have continuously screwed over creators. I’m planning on yanking my music out of there too.

      This explains a bit more

      • protist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’ve been a Pandora subscriber for years because it’s just a better service for music nerds imo. Their “radio” function goes way deeper into catalogs than Spotify ever did. Someone please tell me they’re not run by fascists

        • 13igTyme@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          33
          ·
          2 days ago

          The parent company , XM Radio, donated to Trump and gives fascists a platform. Also their pay out to artists are among the lowest.

          Which is a real shame because I’ve discovered so many good non-mainstream artists thanks to Pandora’s algorithm.

              • protist@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                2 days ago

                This is just not true. If I buy eggs from my neighbor who raises chickens, how is that unethical?

                  • protist@mander.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    This phrase fails as effective rhetoric if this is the intended use.

                • chilicheeselies@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Thats not capitalism. Thats a person producing something and trading it for something else. Capitalism is borrowing capital from a person or entity that has more of it than you, for the promise of a share of the return if there is one. Ita a system of making money without actually working yourself. Its more nuanced than that and it has its pros and cons, but this is a lemmy comment and im just some guy

                  • jaycifer@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    I’ve never heard that the initial investment has to come from a third party for it to be considered capitalism. Does that mean if a person had a business, sold it, then took the capital from that sale to start a new business that couldn’t be considered capitalism since a third party wasn’t the one investing?

                • AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Where did the neighbor get their chickens? How were the chickens raised, transported, cared for? How are the chickens fed, is the food source ethical? Have the chickens been given hormones to increase their egg output?

                  I’m sure there’s a million more questions you could ask that would lead to something being unethical, but there’s way more to it than simply buying eggs.

                  • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    This is what the whole show The Good Place is about.

                    It’s impossible to account for indirectly unethical behavior and realistically survive. The best thing to do is be directly ethical, and at least avoid contact with unethical people and companies personally.

    • FackCurs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      The issue for me is that AI generated music has ruined my experience with Spotify. It started recommending lofi beats (easy to generate with AI) and I didn’t want to spend weeks pushing the algorithm to not have it recommend me that crap.

      Other users have complained about the downturn in quality of the weekly recommendations, which is what kept me there in the first place.

      SoundCloud appears to have better recommendations for the type of music I like.

      https://community.spotify.com/t5/Music-Discussion/Half-of-the-weekly-playlists-are-filled-with-AI-generated/td-p/6288755

      https://mashable.com/article/spotify-ai-generated-songs-dead-artists-pages

    • Ilandar@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m not sure if you’d call this a “boycott”, but many people have also just never used Spotify because they care more about supporting musicians than convenience.

    • REDACTED@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Likely because of that old military investment drama where a company making drones for Ukraine and EU defence did an investment round and spotify joined, which prompted every russian bot farm to attack spotify because of it. As an European, I feel like paying them even if I don’t use spotify.