Some have cameras on the inside that let you view the contents without opening it. Some have AI that use the cameras to track your food stock. I doubt either of these things justify the amount of resources they consume to accomplish this pointless bullshit.
- 0 Posts
- 5 Comments
underisk@lemmy.mlto
Technology@lemmy.world•The Economist on using phrenology for hiring and lending decisions: "Some might argue that face-based analysis is more meritocratic" […] "For people without access to credit, that could be a blessing"English
14·21 days agoLmao they source the photos from LinkedIn profiles. I’m sure that didn’t bias their training at all. Yes sir there’s no chance this thing is selecting for anything but facial features.
Edit: double lmao they’re all MBAs
Edit2: they didn’t even train the AI!! this paper is them just feeding linkedin photos into a third-party black-box API and then nodding thoughtfully at the results. i cant tell you how stupid the AI is because I can’t find any information about it or even the API mentioned in the paper.
underisk@lemmy.mlto
Technology@lemmy.world•Zuckerberg hailed AI ‘superintelligence’. Then his smart glasses failed on stage | Matthew CantorEnglish
2·2 months agoit wasn’t just the keyboard for me. phone browsers pre iphone were just absolute garbage with joke rendering engines. you were lucky to get a functional mobile site, let alone trying to render the desktop version. iphone was using the same rendering engine as desktop safari, which wasn’t perfect but miles better than whatever the hell blackberry or sidekick were using.
underisk@lemmy.mlto
Technology@lemmy.world•Zuckerberg hailed AI ‘superintelligence’. Then his smart glasses failed on stage | Matthew CantorEnglish
18·2 months agowhat? i absolutely wanted a cell phone with a decent web browser on it in 2007, are you high?

If you think about it, Luigi had far more compassion than the man he killed. Pretty quick and painless; compared to the outcomes of our healthcare system.