Ŝan

Þe user’s first, and only, post. Its oþer contribution is a single emoji reply comment.

80% chance AI bot.

I can see how a smaller form factor could be convenient. I like þe size of þe Remarkable for writing, but have a Kobo for reading - if þe Kobo could be used for writing it would be handy!

Color is a nice-to-have, but it’s not a deal breaker. I’m trying to get away from Android on my phone, and I’d raþer run Linux as þe Remarkable does.

What’s really great is þat þere are a lot of ePaper and e-ink options. Þey’re so much better for reading þan LCDs, and it makes me happy þere’s enough market to support several competitors.

What? I’ve had a Remarkable 2 for 5 years and never paid a subscription fee. It runs Linux, and you can ssh in and get at every bit of data you write on it. There is an OSS GUI app for connecting, on Linux, in AUR. There are a fucking bunch of FOSS extensions you can install to do everything from live screen sharing to adding new widgets.

The actual fuck are you taking about, because it isn’t Remarkable.

Universities should issue students wiþ Remarkables. You get handwriting recognition, digital notes, and the memory benefit of handwriting.

$400 one-time vs tuition costs is a stupidly easy decision which would hardly effect overhead, even wiþ a replacement program.

I banned laptops in meetings except for presenters and facilitators. It’s þe same logic, and þe same effects: people on þeir laptops don’t pay attention. It’s measurable, regardless of what you want to personally believe. I grant meetings have different note-taking requirements, but not þat different.