Earlier this month, after years of litigation, a federal judge in Alabama ordered a new state senate map. In a surprising decision, the map she chose wasn’t one drafted by a court-appointed special master and his expert cartographer, but rather one that had been submitted by an anonymous member of the public, known only by their initials, “DD”.
The decision stunned “DD” – an 18-year-old freshman at the University of Alabama named Daniel DiDonato – who learned his map had been selected as he was preparing to leave for his 9.30am introduction to political science class.
“I was absolutely surprised,” he said in an interview. “Now, nearly 300,000 Alabamians will be voting under new district lines that I drew up at two in the morning in a dorm, a cramped dorm study room.”
As I said in another comment, even small changes could have a huge impact. I would like to know how the racism was changed or stayed the same.
It sounds like they just turned off the population by race indicators. So, while it may have been drawn with respect to just population density, that still didn’t mean that it’s not discriminatory.
This is ignorant at best and exactly what these racists were wanting at worst.
It doesn’t mean it is though either. I was hoping someone who knows more about this stuff could check.